On TechRepublic: Your resume will be tossed if. . .

BNET Insight

Sterling Performance

Spotlight on UK business and management

Managers a Barrier to 'Good Jobs'

November 22nd, 2009 @ 4:05 pm

Categories: Jobs, Management, News, Workplace

Tags: Barrier, Job, Team, Manager, Recruitment & Selection, Human Resources, Workforce Management, Joanna Higgins

UK employers may have the will to provide good jobs, but they don’t know the way — and claim bad management’s a major obstacle in improving work.

Employers see the link between quality jobs and company effectiveness, citing fair pay; a culture of trust; staff training; fulfilling and interesting work; autonomy; up-to-date technology; and getting employee engagement as important. And while the majority of the 600 managers and senior executives surveyed for the Work Foundation’s report, “Good Jobs”, reckoned they mostly delivered on those qualities, closer inspection finds areas where job quality must be falling short.

Nearly half  have a problem with sickness absence at work and 50 percent find it hard to recruit talent. One third admit retaining people and underperformance are issues. A further one-quarter struggle with presenteeism and demotivated staff.

In putting together its report for the Health and Safety Executive, the Work Foundation also ran workshops, which reveal the disconnect between what employers know to be good work practices and what really happens. And no amount of HR policies will help if, as one legal firm employer notes, the managers don’t know how to apply them.

There are some common management barriers to job improvement:

  1. Fairness — managers aren’t even-handed in their treatment of individuals in their team. This is often a reason for ill health as employees grow more disheartened by their work.
  2. Willingness to train — a particular issue for technically adept people promoted to management, they feel they don’t need specific management training to do their job and can end up doing neither their old job nor their new one very well.
  3. Delivering the ’soft’ side — some managers struggle with the less defined ’softer’ side of their job and can overlook personal issues that impact on work. Some struggle to take it seriously and drop the ball when it comes to mentoring or one-to-one meetings.
  4. Handling formal procedures — some are inconsistent in carrying out performance reviews or other policies the organisation’s put in place. This can be particularly true of ‘clever’ people who tend to shirk authority and dislike bureaucracy, according to Rob Goffee and Gareth Jones’s book, “Clever.
  5. Resistance to change — it’s a line manager who can determine whether someone in their team can work flexibly. Some aren’t giving requests due consideration, according to employers, who also worry that managers view job-sharers as ’slackers’.
  6. Culture clashes — some organisations will have different ways of doing things from one department to the next. Managers moved from one place to another can find themselves inadvertently leading in a way that will seem alien to their new team.
  7. Trust and autonomy for employees — people given responsibility beyond their job are likely to stay more motivated, but employers feel managers aren’t delegating enough.

But it’s not all the manager’s fault if jobs fail to pass the quality test. Cultural obstacles — ‘the way we do things around here’ and a fear of risk-taking, as well as economic and time pressures — leave little room to consider the ‘good jobs agenda’.

The Work Foundation found this first hand, and the report details how its (free) consultancy work with one manufacturer was deemed too radical and not worth the effort.

Managers are most frequently in the firing line when employers cite obstacles to change — not always fairly. A public sector employer in the report claims the middle-managers in her educational establishment are ‘a disaster’. But what’s being done about it?

The report has called for government to help employers create good jobs, but the Work Foundation’s own recommendation for employers to share best practice with each other seems a far more likely route to success.

The good job assessment: five areas to consider

  • Communications — team briefings, upward feedback, regular employee surveys, exit interviews.
  • Pay and incentives — equal pay reviews, flexible benefits, performance-related pay, team-based rewards.
  • Wellbeing — absence monitoring, access to an Employee Assistance Programme, occupational health advice, stress management training, wellbeing programmes.
  • Work-life balance — flexible or shift-working, job shares.
  • Training & development — job descriptions, objective-setting, performance appraisals, training needs analysis, career development support, study leave.
 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    MotivationDoc

    11/23/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Managers a Barrier to 'Good Jobs'

    Too many organisations still place people in management jobs because they, know the 'business' know the product, know the organisation, know the market. They are expected to have natural, inbuilt skills for managing, leading and motivating people. Most managers 'muddle' along and sadly, some don't have what it takes. Still; it keeps me in a job!

  •  
    2

    packsave

    11/23/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Managers a Barrier to 'Good Jobs'

    I completely agree with the statement. Poor managers prevent capable people progressing in a business. My first ever manager 35 years ago said he would not stand in my way when I wanted to progress, he was a dying breed but one I respected and copied in my approach. I am pleased to say having developed people for many years I see a lot who have worked with me progress to senior posts. Sadly today there are not capable managers willing to make a decision and stand or fall by their decision there is too much politics.

  •  
    3

    MitshK

    11/25/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Managers a Barrier to 'Good Jobs'

    I agree that Managers have proved to be barriers, but only to a degree.

    Training and development is a 50/50 between the manager and the company - if the budget isn't there, then the manager can't do much. If there is money, then it probably isn't much. It's the manager's fault if it's internal (and therefore no actual money cost), if they don't arrange for their team to be able to attend.

    Communication - as far as what they know is down to the manager, but again, if they aren't told then there's not a lot they can do.

    At the end of the day it's company and the specific manager's faults. It's not fair to just blame the manager.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement