On CBSSports.com: Watch March Madness® Online Now!

BNET Insight

Sterling Performance

Spotlight on UK business and management

Ethics: It Pays To Give A Damn

May 27th, 2009 @ 3:25 am

Categories: Leadership, Management, Motivation, Opinion, Workplace

Tags: Private Equity, Ethics, Exec, Investment, Financial Services, Finance, Richard Young

Shell shock: CEO Jeroen van der Veer's bonus is a blight on Royal Dutch Shell's image

Does it pay to be ethical in your business? We’ll come to a definition in a minute, but a couple things suggest the question’s becoming more important.

First, this article on Ethical Corporation, arguing that even the seemingly rapacious and cold-blooded private equity (PE) industry is getting interested in all things cuddly. PE firm Doughty Hanson has now endorsed the Principles for Responsible Investment.

“We’re not doing it to earn brownie points,” the firm’s Guy Paisner told EC. “We are doing it for cold, commercial, opportunistic reasons. Firms that operate in a sustainable way significantly de-risk their business model and ultimately attract higher valuations in the capital markets.”

That justification holds true for many investors and businesses. If the latest boom and bust has taught us anything, it’s that we all need to play a reasonably long game.

PE firms were flipping investments within months in the middle of the decade — a decidedly unsustainable model.

It might be uncharitable to suggest their love of sustainability has been caused by their need to hold onto their own investments for longer as M&A markets languish.

But it’s fair to say firms that are serious about the business of investment banking can see the benefits of long-term risk management.

The other data point is the rejection by shareholders of Shell’s remuneration report. Shell has some other ethical worries, but the exec pay issue strikes to the heart of the public mood.

Can it be ethical for these people to earn so much money? The avowedly upright Co-operative Asset Management obviously thought not.

Which brings us to a definition of “ethical”. For some people it’s just a case of not breaking laws. Whether it’s on the environment, exec pay, working conditions or quality of products and services — so long as it’s legal, it’s ethical.

The problem here is that the last few years have shown us that the rules aren’t actually terribly good at securing good long-term outcomes; and the people who make the regulations aren’t very ethical and tend to be out of touch with business themselves.

So companies that offer excessive rewards for execs shouldn’t be surprised that they now have a problem on their hands despite being perfectly legal.

For many of you, ethical business is a moral imperative. That’s not just working within the law, it’s taking a paternal (yet not patronising) approach to employees, causing no long-term damage to your environment, supporting your community.

These ethical approaches are bedfellows to the more obvious value creators — like going the extra mile for customers and supporting innovation.

In value terms, the longer you can sustain earnings, the more your company should be worth on a net present value calculation (just ask those private equity guys).

But sometimes good ethical considerations yield immediate benefits, too. Just ask John Lewis Partnership. Most retailers (especially the most rapacious ones) would kill for their performance in the midst of a recession. Whichever way you cut it, then, ethics is now seriously good business.

(Photo: WEF, CC2.0)

Richard Young is a London-based writer.
 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Ian P

    05/28/09 | Report as spam

    It all depends...

    ...on what you mean by ethics.
    Since the 1970's the word has been used to beat up certain sections of society in both metaphorical and literal sense and ethical stances have been taken by all sorts of pompous asses who used the concept as an excuse for breaking the law, causing damage and harm to others and for running their own political agendas.
    Take Greenpeace; in their own eyes the ultimate defenders of ethical probity - they have shown themselves over the years as little more than violent thugs willing to put the lives of others at risk to make the six o'clock news.
    Anti-fascist and anti-capitalist groups who are quite willing to maim and kill citizens and police through street riots. To do what? To prevent those they disagree with from expressing themselves legally and freely.
    At the moment ethics is all about despising big bonuses. Well as we have seen from our Parliament, those who sang the loudest about bankers and company CEO's were simply making loud noises to hide their own form of corruption.

    So come on Richard, recognise that the ethics policies and moral stances of today are just political poses designed to demonstrate 'holier than thou' stances that have no real place in our society.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a>)

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement