On mySimon: Laura Mercier Creme Brulee Honey Bath

BNET Insight

Sterling Performance

Spotlight on UK business and management

Do Strong Leaders Destroy Leadership?

October 6th, 2008 @ 9:50 am

Categories: Leadership, Management, Motivation, Talent Management, Workplace

Tags: Leader, Leadership, Management, Robin Stuart-Kotze

 superman.jpg

Google “leadership” and you’ll get around 163 million entries. Search Amazon for books on leadership and you’ll get 39,000 results. A search for leadership articles takes you into the millions. Leadership isn’t a concept, it’s an industry.

The modern business press have glorified leaders and leadership. Leaders have become the modern equivalent of Roman Emperors, elevated to the status of gods — and treated in a manner befitting latter-day gods.

Society has been led to believe that an organisation’s success or failure rests almost entirely on the shoulders of one individual. When football teams perform badly, it’s not the players who get fired, it’s the coach or manager. When corporations stumble the focus of attention is the chief executive — although able politickers will deflect the blame.

CEO turnover is quite rapid, but companies learn nothing from this — they just appoint a new one. Then, with the same products, the same technology, the same finances, the same markets and the same people, the new CEO is expected to perform the required Herculean feat. But it is usually impossible.

Changing the performance of a large organisation takes the efforts of thousands, not a single person, even if they wear their underpants over their trousers.

Strong, powerful leaders are detrimental. Their decisions determine much of what an organisation does, killing off leadership in the rest of the business.

The more powerful the leader, the less people in the organisation are willing to put forward their ideas and suggestions. What’s the point of expressing an opinion when it will be completely ignored? When intelligent and capable people are prevented from initiating and doing things that make a difference, given no say in how things operate, and are simply told what to do, they become disengaged.

Instead of taking initiative they become increasingly passive and wait for the dominant leader to provide the direction and make the decisions. The cry from executives, “Why can’t anyone in this company make a decision? Why does everything end up on my desk?” has a simple answer: “Because you don’t let them”.

Leadership in virtually any group of any size is not something that only one person can, should, or does provide. Everyone has a role to play.

Dominating leadership overpowers people. It kills leadership and cultivates followership. As Jeff Pfeffer remarks, “For the talents and ideas of others to emerge, leaders need to step back and provide the space for this to occur.”

Peter Drucker’s dictum was that the person doing a job knows more about it that anyone. So if you want to know how to do things better who’s the best person to ask?

Does your company have a ‘tell them’ or an ‘ask them’ approach to leadership?

(Photo Xurble CC2.0)

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    vdonof

    10/10/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Do Strong Leaders Destroy Leadership?

    By strong, do you mean pompous? I don't completely agree with your interpretation of strong. Leadership is about empowering, bringing people together, providing a cohesive vision and motivating. None of this can be effective without listening and some level of collaboration. I would argue that a strong leader is never overbearing. The "my way or the highway approach" is simply not leading, it is ego basting. Also, a completely untethered leadership style is dangerous, since encouraging too much independent leadership can be counter productive, especially when lower ranking parties have widely differing opinions. That is not to say independent thinking should be discouraged. A strong leader keeps the ship sailing straight toward a single destination without being autocratic.

  •  
    2

    Paul Pangaro

    10/10/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Do Strong Leaders Destroy Leadership?

    an alternative view of 'leadership' is offered in the
    PDF at http://pangaro.com/littlegreybook/, see
    pp. 28-31. direct link to PDF is http://pangaro.com/littlegreybook.pdf
    -paul@cyberneticlifestyles.com

  •  
    3

    ChrisHooked

    10/10/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Do Strong Leaders Destroy Leadership?

    Is this a trick question?

    No, strong leaders do not destroy leadership. They also do not completely ignore intelligent expression of opinion. Nor do they simply tell people what to do, as your article suggests.

    Strong leaders routinely solicit opinions and feedback. As mentioned above, they empower and encourage. They don't merely espouse the "open door policy", they kick down the door and require input, then commitment.

    Strong leaders are not too insecure to be open or too afraid to be decisive. They're discerning about when to lean to or fro. The cultures created by strong leaders develop leaders. They work to de-centralize when appropriate and put a righteous foot down necessary.

    What's at least unfortunate is the dearth of strong leaders who occupy leadership positions. Count our current Presidential Administration and its predecessor, the majority in our current Congress and its predecessor, Enron leaders, Wall Street leaders, a tragic number of priests, coaches who cheat, not to mention all the insecure cowards in too many upstairs offices who squash, discourage or unfairly terminate--I'm out of breath!

    Rest assured, strong leadership needs no title. It just needs to replace a few current title holders.

    Evidently, it's easy to get a little discouraged or confused about what strong leadership is. Let's at least try to agree on what it isn't.

  •  
    4

    mmello

    10/10/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Do Strong Leaders Destroy Leadership?

    After 22 years working with CEOs, there's one thing I can guarantee: it is a WEAK leader that destroys leadership!

    A weakness manifests itself in many different forms, not only feebleness: irresolution, defensiveness, authoritarian behavior, impulsiveness, manipulation. But the end result is always the same: a highly political, dysfunctional leadership team, that contaminates the rest of the organization and, finally, destroys profits.

    It is a very naif mistake, to confound authoritarian despotism with "strong leadership". Despotism is a defense strategy typical of weak people in positions of power they feel ill prepared to handle.

  •  
    5

    roybc

    10/10/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Do Strong Leaders Destroy Leadership?

    We must first understand what "Strong Leadership' means to Mr.Robin Stuart-Kotze.

  •  
    6

    dougsmithtraining

    10/14/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Do Strong Leaders Destroy Leadership?

    Leaders must be strong, courageous, compassionate,
    participative, creative, and so much more. What they dare
    not be is so dominate that they shut down shared
    leadership.

    That seems to be the point of this fine article.

    Doug Smith
    http://www.dougsmithtraining.com
    Developing Leadership Skills

  •  
    7

    plrss

    11/07/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Do Strong Leaders Destroy Leadership?

    Strong leadership is a requirement for change
    not egos

  •  
    8

    jleuthard

    11/12/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Do Strong Leaders Destroy Leadership?

    Positive leadership, by my definition, fosters engagement and leadership at all levels. Unfortunately, some people confuse leadership with dictatoriship and the need to control everything. True leadership supports and positions others to be successful. It is frustrating to work for someone who gives lip service to inclusive leadership, yet makes sure all decisions made at all levels agree with his/hers. That is not true leadership. As a leader, surround yourself with capable people, be clear about global expectations and outcomes and help them work together. Then get out of their way and let them do their jobs and be the leaders they want to be.

  •  
    9

    caramel-correspondence

    01/20/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Do Strong Leaders Destroy Leadership?

    This article has been very persuasive in that 'strong leaders destroy leadership' but its only points out the difference between a strong leader and a good leader. Personally, I think it sounds like an article scolding the choice of the words 'strong leader' because egotistical leaders are obviously not good leaders.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a>)

advertisement

Blogger Profiles

  • Blogger Thumbnail Robin Stuart-Kotze Robin Stuart-Kotze is a founder of the consultancy Behavioural Science Systems, whose clients include P&O, BP, Oracle, and Johnson & Johnson. He’s also made his way in management, largely in the financial services sector in the UK and Canada. A distinguished academic with a PhD in organisational psychology, Robin co-wrote “Who Are Your Best People?” about effective talent management. more »

advertisement
advertisement