Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Posted in:
Executive recruitment firms are full of talented candidates who cite the reason for their career transition (aka redundancy, resignation or dismissal) as being the politics of their former employer.
Many are looking for greener grass -- an organisation where they can perform at their best without demotivating office politics and power struggles. This aspiration is laudable but it's a little naïve.
Humans are political by nature. In many respects, political activity is synonymous with influencing activity. Scholars such as Maslow and McClelland have demonstrated that we are hard wired to achieve, if only to put food on the table or to be accepted by supportive social groupings. This requires that we have to influence other people in some way.
For many, the difference between influence and politics is found in the underlying intent that motivates the action. In most cases the actions -- and the skills -- are identical.
If the intent is orientated towards self-interest, lack of trust pervades and politicking escalates. When the motivation is to move the organisation forward while recognising personal interest, collaboration can flourish.
Holding on to the belief that you don’t do politics can create a blind spot which may prevent you from developing positive influencing skills.
If this applies to you, reflect on the questions below. There's every possibility that the grass could be greener where you are working now.
posted by Colin Gautrey
January 6, 2009 @ 6:02 am
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.